Smallholders farmers and domestic communities, who are the groups included in US organizers produce 70% of the world’s food. Through sustainable agriculture. A popular summit has been called by UN organizers. Hundreds of civil society groups, scholars, and social acts boycotted the first UN World Food Summit.
Because of the anger that is growing and that all the program has been hijacked by a frosty web of corporate enthusiasm.
90 WORLD LEADERS WILL ATTEND THE UN FOOD SUMMIT
The summit’s effort to know the solutions for the particular food system. Some have also blamed the significance of brands like Nestle, Bayer, and Tyson. Approx 90 world leaders are expected to attend the first UN summit for food in Newyork.
Almost 130 countries are engaged in committing food issues. Like healthy eating, carbon capture, food waste contraction, free school feasts, and biodata.
The statement which is enlisted by approx 600 groups and individuals in the first UN food summit stated that
” [We] deny this current corporate colonization of food direction and food systems under the first UN food summit. The attempt for unceasing, just, and healthy food systems cant be isolated from the sensibility of people. Whose rights, knowledge and income have not been accepted and disrespectful”.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS and un food summit
The first UN food summit has taken two years and around millions to coordinate. It was assembled evidently to extract political engagement. To help deliver the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) because of ongoing public assessment.
The food industry’s a donation to hunger, malnutrition, fatness, and environmental eradication. Biodiversity damage and climate discord.
Just to generate continual and stable solutions. UN would work as a broker that gathers views from a whole wide range of experts. Academics, NGOs, humanitarian donors, farmers, community and domestic groups, businesses, and associations.
It was publicized as a landmark drive.
MICHEAL FAKHRI’S STATEMENT
Micheal Fakhri, who is the UN special rapporteur on the authority to food and counselor to the summit stated that;
” The courage of the UN to keep on calling this first UN’s food summit a people’s summit is imperious which starts to lose support also, [as is] declaring to my participation without even hearing to any of the substantive things I’ve said”
Fakhri and those who have boycotted the first food summit stated that; UN has given the private sector a dominant role. In almost every part of the summit, which leads to the transnational corporations and their accessory in the nonprofit and generosity sectors. To have greater chances of directing food, financing, and government policies.
SOFIA MOSALVE’S STATEMENT
Sofia Monsalve, secretary-general of the Food First Information and Action Network (FIAN). It is a research and advocacy organization based in Germany.
Sofia Monsalve stated that;
“The UN has provided a cover of legitimacy for corporations to capture the narrative and deflate public pressure- it has not been an honest broker”
Monsalve added that;
” The defiance to discuss major issues like a concentration in every part of the food system, corporate land grabs, taxation and accountability for human rights liability means that the summit will be failed”
As a result, they say that solutions will be marked-led, gradual, spontaneous, and heavily weighted towards increasing food production. Through capital big data and dominant technologies.
Critics say that the vast majority of people on the planet will empower a sprinkling. Individuals to expand the control over the global food system to the more disabled.
According to the UN special rapporteur Fakhri, It took months to influence organizers. To include human rights in the discussions. And even that the food develops only in the margins.
“ We can see the same collective players who have caused irreversible damage to our health, climate, and environment just by trying to create a new game, to get more effective and engrave our new economic opportunities “
AGNES KALIBATA, THE SPECIAL ENVOY TO THE SUMMIT
Agnes Kalibata, the special envoy to the summit, fiercely rejected all the criticism. She told that the farmers, youth groups, and scholars have been defined in extraordinary numbers. And those who are boycotting the summit spoke for issues, not for people.
” The summit is organized not to corporate but to start working together to change the food system and distribute on the SDGs, that is mainly based on human rights… every other country has engaged, people have invited and heard too,”
But a new analysis that is published on the eve of the first food summit advised that non-corporate participants have been hesitant in favor of big corporations. That represents by and allied with business associations, nonprofits, and philanthropy groups.
For example, the summit has been divided into five areas which are called action tracks.
“Big agricultural solutions blunt what the vast majority of the world’s food producers are trying to do to protect the environment and to cool the climate”
NETTIE WEIBE, LA VIA CAMPESINA
Nettie Weibe of La Via Campesina is a global provincial movement that represents small farmers, rural workers, and domestic farmers. She stated that her organization depart and begin to organize against the summit. Because it was ” deeply undemocratic”, irresponsible, and derisive of those who don’t. She added that they have neither money nor power.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM and un food summit
The World Economic Forum, a corporate-funded transnational organization of business and politics and creative and civil society leader( usually known as Davos). It has played an important role in the first food summit while working to unlock $90tn in new investments and infrastructure.
An international CEO-led coalition promotes the idea that businesses and wealthy elites can solve climatic problems. And environmental derogation caused by extractivism.
“This corporate juggernaut must be stopped, or we risk deepening environmental discrimination and human rights infraction,”
Kalibata opposed that grassroots groups and poor countries have been seen to listen and said that the private sector was important to solving the damage in the food system.
” I want them to fix the problems that they are causing- we need their help with solutions” .